I was watching the attacks in the Mangalore pub on TV. In earlier days, when I was feisty and change-the-world, this would have earned a nice long blog post all by itself. Not that it makes me any less angry now, but I've sort of given up ranting on subjects I'm going to do nothing about. I'm also a little weary of people who send me email forwards about Sri Lanka while acting mean to everyone else around them. They remind me of the lady in The Catcher in the Rye who cries for a scene in the movie but will not take the kid next to her to the bathroom. This is not to say that you ought to wash your hands off the world. But merely agreeing to be angry in little cliques changes nothing.
But I can rant about what I can change. That's allowed. So when I was watching the Mangalore attacks and listening to these Ram Sene people vowing that they were doing their duty by saving Indian Culture from the corrupting influences of the West, I was reminded of the conversations and snarly email exchanges at my workplace. Culture, somehow, has become a thing of the past, something that remains beautiful because it is veiled from the present. I had to struggle quite a bit to include the contemporary section in the revamped magazine. Contemporary stories are, apparently, not part of Indian Culture because well, how can children learn the Right from the Wrong in this godless age? I have nothing against mythology- on the contrary, I read as much of it as I can because I delight in ambiguity. I love the same tale recast in several moulds. I love folk tales and the whole Akbar-Birbal witticisms. But I cannot see why contemporary writing should be treated with disdain just because it is set in the here and now of things.
I watched Slumdog Millionaire on Monday. I loved the O Saya song in which the kids race from the airport to their homes in the slums. This is perhaps one of the not-okay scenes for those branding the film as 'selling poverty to the West'. And yet, the mood of the song does not dwell on the squalor. The filth is in the background, something that the children hardly notice in their mad, joyous scramble to safety. This is not to romanticize poverty at all- I think the film had enough gut-wrenching material ('feel good' movie it certainly isn't, improbable perhaps) to demolish such notions. Instead, what I found interesting was the script's genuine attempt to engage with the children's reality. The fact that Salim tells Jamal he dropped a sitter- the noisy plane that flies over Jamal's head is of no significance to the cricketers because it is the everyday, the unremarkable- shows an understanding of their lives and their realities. Cricket everywhere, cricket anywhere is a scene that we are all familiar with and it's not surprising at all that the audience unanimously cheers for the players, no matter how many rules they break in the process. Because this is such an integral part of our culture. And this is a story that is set in its here and now.
At present, only the English magazine has been revamped. When I suggested that we begin to do the same for regional languages as well, there began a dispute on whether we should 'contemporarize' the content at all since the brand stands for Indian Culture. I find this self-imposed alienation from everyday culture indigestible. That by writing a story in which I mention a mobile phone or a packet of Lays, I have somehow squandered away the wisdom of my ancestors. That by mentioning incidents that happened in real life which can serve as reference points in chronology for children, I have somehow killed their value systems. You can't teach culture to someone. You learn it by observation and through experience. You can tell a child not to spit on the roads till your face is blue, but if you spit on the roads right after the lesson, chances are that he/she will remember your deviance more and devalue the lesson.
A refusal to talk to children about everyday reality and contemporary culture is a dangerous trend. We have somehow convinced ourselves that the word 'culture' means 'tradition' and that anything traditional is compulsorily good. By the same logic, anything 'modern' becomes compulsorily bad. It's funny how 'modern' has come to have such heavy negative connotations. There is no creature more dangerous than the Modern Young Woman. She is an indisciplined child who has set out to wreck the cultural ethos of entire nations. Whether it be Arvind Swamy in Roja who wants to marry a 'simple, village girl' or Vijay in Sivakasi exhorting Asin to wear silk sarees, our movies have made it amply clear that Modern Young Women are undesirable in the family scene. They are great for item numbers to show the hero's unbridled sexuality, of course. While the issues I've mentioned here might seem different, they all hinge upon the rhetoric of Indian Culture- an increasingly saffron and ironically Talibanesque ideology that is being allowed to grow. While the obvious reasons for this growth are political, it is also true that such ideologies receive some degree of support from the societies that they thrive in- not for political reasons but because the people believe they are indeed the protectors of Indian Culture.
I don't want to write about the Kamasutra or Kajuraho because citing them time and again makes it seem as if these are the only examples of a different Indian Culture. Besides, doing so once again makes culture a thing of the past. I read Meenakshi Madhavan Reddy's You're Here a while ago and quite enjoyed it. Before reading the book, I'd read a number of vicious comments on her blog, scathing reviews that criticized her for equating a 'sex and drink' lifestyle with feminism, and strong denials that her urban India was anything close to reality. Nowhere in the novel does Meenakshi say that her protagonist is a feminist. I found it funny that so many reviewers, predominantly male, were thumping her down as a pseudo-feminist while crying themselves hoarse for upholding brand feminism that is self-sacrificing in its desire to save poor women in rural India. If one is female, one necessarily has to be self-sacrificing, I guess. If you self-sacrifice yourself for a man/family, you are an acceptable woman, if you self-sacrifice yourself for a woman, you are an acceptable feminist. But if you lead your life the way you choose to for nobody else but you, you lose the right to call yourself a feminist. I don't think You're Here is chick-lit either. It is the story of a young woman in urban India and it is pretty realistic in its description, accurate in its moods, and funny in all the right parts. Novels by Sashi Deshpande that typically deal with the sodden, depressing 'realities' of uninspiring women who will do nothing about their lives somehow find their way to the Feminist section in bookshops. I guess her protagonists' typical disenchantment with sex automatically displaces them from the chick-lit genre. The brooding misery of the women in her book have always bored me, they are all victims, women who absolve themselves from the crime of letting their lives get so pathetic by wearing the helpless tag of womanhood. And yet, Deshpande won the Sahitya Akademi while a book like You're Here that's far more realistic and honest about a growing section in contemporary culture gets flayed because of the unapologetic Modern Young Woman who tells her story in the book. I am not suggesting that You're Here is the greatest book I've ever read. But it is certainly a book that I enjoyed because it's refreshing to read writing that you can relate to. That celebrates ordinary moments and admits that however much life sucks, there are plenty of things that make one laugh. Deshpande's heroines never laugh. Not in a self-loving way at any rate.
If we as adults- writers, editors, publishers, and parents- must produce literature for children that teaches them about Indian Culture, let's not play down the value of a culture that they see and experience around them. Explaining contemporary culture does not translate into morbid and scary realities alone. While it is important to discuss child sexual abuse with children, discussing issues such as these is not the only claim to contemporary culture that we have. There are so many stories tumbling out of everyday India that children will take pleasure in reading. I say this with some degree of evidence since month after month, I get mails from kids who tell me what stories they enjoyed in the magazine. And contemporary stories figure heavily in the lists. If these stories did not touch a chord in the lives of these children (again, not necessarily a chord of tragedy), they wouldn't have stayed in their memories. It is difficult to explain content to people who ride the Holy Cow of Indian Culture. Who assume that contemporary stories lack values because they don't come with a moral at the end. It is frustrating to explain day after day that if children reject the trite moral stories and didactic mythology that forms much of our editorial fodder, it is not because they don't know any better. It is because they do know and have read better. If you don't respect your audience's ability to discern good material, then you are making a grave mistake. This is an editorial moral, a valuable lesson, a great value that we must all digest before we begin to 'educate' our audience.
This strange appropriation of Indian Culture that has turned its back upon so many of our realities must not be allowed to continue. Whether it is a question of beating up pub-goers in Mangalore or insisting that children don't know what Lays is. Philip Larkin once said, "Deprivation is for me what daffodils were for Wordsworth." If you continue to write about flowers in idyllic settings as if this is in the here and now long after they have been mowed down to build roads, somewhere down the line, you will lose your audience. Instead, look at what Allen Ginsberg did with flowers:
So my dear colleagues, I did not send out this email because this Modern Young Woman has no hope that you will read it with patience. How will you when you don't read your own magazine? But I do intend to go after you with my claws out, with every rage that is worthy of a shrew. You have no right to define my India for me. And so I will rant here about this and not about Mangalore.
But I can rant about what I can change. That's allowed. So when I was watching the Mangalore attacks and listening to these Ram Sene people vowing that they were doing their duty by saving Indian Culture from the corrupting influences of the West, I was reminded of the conversations and snarly email exchanges at my workplace. Culture, somehow, has become a thing of the past, something that remains beautiful because it is veiled from the present. I had to struggle quite a bit to include the contemporary section in the revamped magazine. Contemporary stories are, apparently, not part of Indian Culture because well, how can children learn the Right from the Wrong in this godless age? I have nothing against mythology- on the contrary, I read as much of it as I can because I delight in ambiguity. I love the same tale recast in several moulds. I love folk tales and the whole Akbar-Birbal witticisms. But I cannot see why contemporary writing should be treated with disdain just because it is set in the here and now of things.
I watched Slumdog Millionaire on Monday. I loved the O Saya song in which the kids race from the airport to their homes in the slums. This is perhaps one of the not-okay scenes for those branding the film as 'selling poverty to the West'. And yet, the mood of the song does not dwell on the squalor. The filth is in the background, something that the children hardly notice in their mad, joyous scramble to safety. This is not to romanticize poverty at all- I think the film had enough gut-wrenching material ('feel good' movie it certainly isn't, improbable perhaps) to demolish such notions. Instead, what I found interesting was the script's genuine attempt to engage with the children's reality. The fact that Salim tells Jamal he dropped a sitter- the noisy plane that flies over Jamal's head is of no significance to the cricketers because it is the everyday, the unremarkable- shows an understanding of their lives and their realities. Cricket everywhere, cricket anywhere is a scene that we are all familiar with and it's not surprising at all that the audience unanimously cheers for the players, no matter how many rules they break in the process. Because this is such an integral part of our culture. And this is a story that is set in its here and now.
At present, only the English magazine has been revamped. When I suggested that we begin to do the same for regional languages as well, there began a dispute on whether we should 'contemporarize' the content at all since the brand stands for Indian Culture. I find this self-imposed alienation from everyday culture indigestible. That by writing a story in which I mention a mobile phone or a packet of Lays, I have somehow squandered away the wisdom of my ancestors. That by mentioning incidents that happened in real life which can serve as reference points in chronology for children, I have somehow killed their value systems. You can't teach culture to someone. You learn it by observation and through experience. You can tell a child not to spit on the roads till your face is blue, but if you spit on the roads right after the lesson, chances are that he/she will remember your deviance more and devalue the lesson.
A refusal to talk to children about everyday reality and contemporary culture is a dangerous trend. We have somehow convinced ourselves that the word 'culture' means 'tradition' and that anything traditional is compulsorily good. By the same logic, anything 'modern' becomes compulsorily bad. It's funny how 'modern' has come to have such heavy negative connotations. There is no creature more dangerous than the Modern Young Woman. She is an indisciplined child who has set out to wreck the cultural ethos of entire nations. Whether it be Arvind Swamy in Roja who wants to marry a 'simple, village girl' or Vijay in Sivakasi exhorting Asin to wear silk sarees, our movies have made it amply clear that Modern Young Women are undesirable in the family scene. They are great for item numbers to show the hero's unbridled sexuality, of course. While the issues I've mentioned here might seem different, they all hinge upon the rhetoric of Indian Culture- an increasingly saffron and ironically Talibanesque ideology that is being allowed to grow. While the obvious reasons for this growth are political, it is also true that such ideologies receive some degree of support from the societies that they thrive in- not for political reasons but because the people believe they are indeed the protectors of Indian Culture.
I don't want to write about the Kamasutra or Kajuraho because citing them time and again makes it seem as if these are the only examples of a different Indian Culture. Besides, doing so once again makes culture a thing of the past. I read Meenakshi Madhavan Reddy's You're Here a while ago and quite enjoyed it. Before reading the book, I'd read a number of vicious comments on her blog, scathing reviews that criticized her for equating a 'sex and drink' lifestyle with feminism, and strong denials that her urban India was anything close to reality. Nowhere in the novel does Meenakshi say that her protagonist is a feminist. I found it funny that so many reviewers, predominantly male, were thumping her down as a pseudo-feminist while crying themselves hoarse for upholding brand feminism that is self-sacrificing in its desire to save poor women in rural India. If one is female, one necessarily has to be self-sacrificing, I guess. If you self-sacrifice yourself for a man/family, you are an acceptable woman, if you self-sacrifice yourself for a woman, you are an acceptable feminist. But if you lead your life the way you choose to for nobody else but you, you lose the right to call yourself a feminist. I don't think You're Here is chick-lit either. It is the story of a young woman in urban India and it is pretty realistic in its description, accurate in its moods, and funny in all the right parts. Novels by Sashi Deshpande that typically deal with the sodden, depressing 'realities' of uninspiring women who will do nothing about their lives somehow find their way to the Feminist section in bookshops. I guess her protagonists' typical disenchantment with sex automatically displaces them from the chick-lit genre. The brooding misery of the women in her book have always bored me, they are all victims, women who absolve themselves from the crime of letting their lives get so pathetic by wearing the helpless tag of womanhood. And yet, Deshpande won the Sahitya Akademi while a book like You're Here that's far more realistic and honest about a growing section in contemporary culture gets flayed because of the unapologetic Modern Young Woman who tells her story in the book. I am not suggesting that You're Here is the greatest book I've ever read. But it is certainly a book that I enjoyed because it's refreshing to read writing that you can relate to. That celebrates ordinary moments and admits that however much life sucks, there are plenty of things that make one laugh. Deshpande's heroines never laugh. Not in a self-loving way at any rate.
If we as adults- writers, editors, publishers, and parents- must produce literature for children that teaches them about Indian Culture, let's not play down the value of a culture that they see and experience around them. Explaining contemporary culture does not translate into morbid and scary realities alone. While it is important to discuss child sexual abuse with children, discussing issues such as these is not the only claim to contemporary culture that we have. There are so many stories tumbling out of everyday India that children will take pleasure in reading. I say this with some degree of evidence since month after month, I get mails from kids who tell me what stories they enjoyed in the magazine. And contemporary stories figure heavily in the lists. If these stories did not touch a chord in the lives of these children (again, not necessarily a chord of tragedy), they wouldn't have stayed in their memories. It is difficult to explain content to people who ride the Holy Cow of Indian Culture. Who assume that contemporary stories lack values because they don't come with a moral at the end. It is frustrating to explain day after day that if children reject the trite moral stories and didactic mythology that forms much of our editorial fodder, it is not because they don't know any better. It is because they do know and have read better. If you don't respect your audience's ability to discern good material, then you are making a grave mistake. This is an editorial moral, a valuable lesson, a great value that we must all digest before we begin to 'educate' our audience.
This strange appropriation of Indian Culture that has turned its back upon so many of our realities must not be allowed to continue. Whether it is a question of beating up pub-goers in Mangalore or insisting that children don't know what Lays is. Philip Larkin once said, "Deprivation is for me what daffodils were for Wordsworth." If you continue to write about flowers in idyllic settings as if this is in the here and now long after they have been mowed down to build roads, somewhere down the line, you will lose your audience. Instead, look at what Allen Ginsberg did with flowers:
- "...A perfect beauty of a sunflower! a perfect excellent
- lovely sunflower existence! a sweet natural eye
- to the new hip moon, woke up alive and excited
- grasping in the sunset shadow sunrise golden
- monthly breeze!
- How many flies buzzed round you innocent of your
- grime, while you cursed the heavens of the
- railroad and your flower soul?
- Poor dead flower? when did you forget you were a
- flower? when did you look at your skin and
- decide you were an impotent dirty old locomotive?
- the ghost of a locomotive? the specter and
- shade of a once powerful mad American locomotive?
- You were never no locomotive, Sunflower, you were a
- sunflower!
- And you Locomotive, you are a locomotive, forget me
- not!..." [From Sunflower Sutra]
So my dear colleagues, I did not send out this email because this Modern Young Woman has no hope that you will read it with patience. How will you when you don't read your own magazine? But I do intend to go after you with my claws out, with every rage that is worthy of a shrew. You have no right to define my India for me. And so I will rant here about this and not about Mangalore.

