___
Once you have landed a writing job and are finally getting paid to do what you want to do, you begin to feel antsy. Because that's simply how our brain is structured. We like problems because they keep us occupied. They catalyze us from our static states of existence. They give us a justifiable reason for self-obsession. And this is why depressed people are people who don't know how to be sad.
Once you have landed a job where you are required to do work that you like doing, you begin to feel that all is too perfect. When you have to write because someone is paying you to do it, a part of you immediately resents this. You don't want your writing to be read and torn apart by a monster-editor who never seems to like anything you write. It is one thing to get your writing peer reviewed and critiqued, it is another to have it critiqued by someone who could potentially fire you. You begin to hate the red lines across your manuscript. Every time you open a Word document and type out the words, you delete them because you can see your editor wrinkling his/her nose up. You feel angry. You know you are a good writer. Isn't that why you were hired in the first place? If your creativity is going to be questioned all the time, if your lines lose the rhythm with which they marched into your head because your editor thinks they are too obscure, if self-doubt begins to creep into your words...and worse still, if you begin to write like your editor so your work is approved...what good will that be?
The fact about writing for a living is that someone is letting you do it. Someone is paying you to write and that someone has a right upon your writing. This is a fact that writers in corporate setups need to understand, digest, and embrace. Even if you are writing for a publishing house that has accepted your manuscript, you must share the ownership of your work with the editorial team there simply because they are investing in you. I've been a writer with corporate setups and have written for publishing houses. In both cases, your heart does die a little every time your lines get axed. Or rewritten. Or changed into something else altogether. And you are left saying, that is not it at all, that is not what I meant at all.
Coming to terms with editorial practices is a part of growing up as a writer. I was an editor and a writer at the same time- I was the editor for the English magazine in my last place of work; I used to write for the magazine as well as write for publishing houses. As an editor, I trashed perfectly good stories because they didn't fit what the magazine needed at that point. I chopped lines. I changed storylines. I axed whole paragraphs because the story went beyond the two pages that it was allotted. I wrote rejection letters to many writers, I got into heated arguments with writers who wouldn't want a word of their story changed, I never got back to some writers about their manuscripts because there simply wasn't any time. And as a writer, I spent hours refreshing my inbox to see if the publishers had replied to my hundredth mail asking about the status of my manuscript.
Publishing is a hard industry. It takes time for publishing houses to get returns on their investment. Like any other industry, it is about making money. And you, as a writer, are a very tiny part of it. Sure, without you, there is no book....but there are hundreds and thousands of writers who will write more books for the publishing industry to have its fodder. The sooner you understand how negligible you are, the faster you will make your peace. There is nothing wrong with making profits or wanting to. And it is the job of the editorial to find a balance between what is good material and what is sale-able material. The editorial will accept or reject, chop or keep your words keeping this in mind. And there is no point in virtuously walking away from this fact.
The reason why many of us are so wary of anyone touching our manuscripts is that we give ourselves way too much importance. This is understandable because the process of creation is exhausting (even the good Lord took rest after he was done creating). It is exhilarating and it gives you joy that is intensely personal. But the second it is read by somebody else and they point out your errors, the obscurity of the writing, the non-sale-ability of it, it dwindles into ordinariness. Your joy suddenly becomes foolish. This is a painful process only if you refuse to see the reasons behind the rejection. Achieving a balance between what you want to write and what you have to write at your work-place is hard work. I adapted myself to it because I was seeing the process from both ends- as an editor and as a writer. Writing for pleasure is one thing and writing professionally is another. The second might seem like a lesser god because of the money involved, but it is a tougher penance that will teach you many valuable lessons.
How does one retain love for the art while writing for a living? If you are not free to write as you please, can you still be in love with it? You retain the love by working hard to do so. By not lying to yourself about your insecurities. By respecting the views of your editors. And by understanding survival in a hard industry. You have a choice: to walk away and hide your art in the safety of your own shadow. Or to lay it under the sun with pride and walk away...while the world takes care of it.
(concluded)
Once you have landed a writing job and are finally getting paid to do what you want to do, you begin to feel antsy. Because that's simply how our brain is structured. We like problems because they keep us occupied. They catalyze us from our static states of existence. They give us a justifiable reason for self-obsession. And this is why depressed people are people who don't know how to be sad.
Once you have landed a job where you are required to do work that you like doing, you begin to feel that all is too perfect. When you have to write because someone is paying you to do it, a part of you immediately resents this. You don't want your writing to be read and torn apart by a monster-editor who never seems to like anything you write. It is one thing to get your writing peer reviewed and critiqued, it is another to have it critiqued by someone who could potentially fire you. You begin to hate the red lines across your manuscript. Every time you open a Word document and type out the words, you delete them because you can see your editor wrinkling his/her nose up. You feel angry. You know you are a good writer. Isn't that why you were hired in the first place? If your creativity is going to be questioned all the time, if your lines lose the rhythm with which they marched into your head because your editor thinks they are too obscure, if self-doubt begins to creep into your words...and worse still, if you begin to write like your editor so your work is approved...what good will that be?
The fact about writing for a living is that someone is letting you do it. Someone is paying you to write and that someone has a right upon your writing. This is a fact that writers in corporate setups need to understand, digest, and embrace. Even if you are writing for a publishing house that has accepted your manuscript, you must share the ownership of your work with the editorial team there simply because they are investing in you. I've been a writer with corporate setups and have written for publishing houses. In both cases, your heart does die a little every time your lines get axed. Or rewritten. Or changed into something else altogether. And you are left saying, that is not it at all, that is not what I meant at all.
Coming to terms with editorial practices is a part of growing up as a writer. I was an editor and a writer at the same time- I was the editor for the English magazine in my last place of work; I used to write for the magazine as well as write for publishing houses. As an editor, I trashed perfectly good stories because they didn't fit what the magazine needed at that point. I chopped lines. I changed storylines. I axed whole paragraphs because the story went beyond the two pages that it was allotted. I wrote rejection letters to many writers, I got into heated arguments with writers who wouldn't want a word of their story changed, I never got back to some writers about their manuscripts because there simply wasn't any time. And as a writer, I spent hours refreshing my inbox to see if the publishers had replied to my hundredth mail asking about the status of my manuscript.
Publishing is a hard industry. It takes time for publishing houses to get returns on their investment. Like any other industry, it is about making money. And you, as a writer, are a very tiny part of it. Sure, without you, there is no book....but there are hundreds and thousands of writers who will write more books for the publishing industry to have its fodder. The sooner you understand how negligible you are, the faster you will make your peace. There is nothing wrong with making profits or wanting to. And it is the job of the editorial to find a balance between what is good material and what is sale-able material. The editorial will accept or reject, chop or keep your words keeping this in mind. And there is no point in virtuously walking away from this fact.
The reason why many of us are so wary of anyone touching our manuscripts is that we give ourselves way too much importance. This is understandable because the process of creation is exhausting (even the good Lord took rest after he was done creating). It is exhilarating and it gives you joy that is intensely personal. But the second it is read by somebody else and they point out your errors, the obscurity of the writing, the non-sale-ability of it, it dwindles into ordinariness. Your joy suddenly becomes foolish. This is a painful process only if you refuse to see the reasons behind the rejection. Achieving a balance between what you want to write and what you have to write at your work-place is hard work. I adapted myself to it because I was seeing the process from both ends- as an editor and as a writer. Writing for pleasure is one thing and writing professionally is another. The second might seem like a lesser god because of the money involved, but it is a tougher penance that will teach you many valuable lessons.
How does one retain love for the art while writing for a living? If you are not free to write as you please, can you still be in love with it? You retain the love by working hard to do so. By not lying to yourself about your insecurities. By respecting the views of your editors. And by understanding survival in a hard industry. You have a choice: to walk away and hide your art in the safety of your own shadow. Or to lay it under the sun with pride and walk away...while the world takes care of it.
(concluded)


14 comments:
Phew! That was some tough lesson indeed.
I knew that surviving in the publishing world is not easy, but didn't really know about it to this extent. I've yet to start my journey, and it always helps to understand such things, you know.
Thanks.
"Writing for pleasure is one thing and writing professionally is another. The second might seem like a lesser god because of the money involved, but it is a tougher penance that will teach you many valuable lessons." Several lines in the post were captivating for what they had to convey but these were the takeaway for me! :)
I surmise it is good in a way for you to have seen the 'process' - to be read corporately - as it were from both ends as you have admitted. It has probably made you look at the spectrum of rejections, 'tinkering' and acceptance with a lot more equanimity than someone who is purely a writer or purely an editor would! :) (And aren't most significant things in life about equanimity anyway which comes with acceptance, among other things, of one's insecurities and dealing with them rather than denying them?!)
Very enlightening post again. I am sure the series would have sufficiently impacted if not influenced wannabe writers who visit here. Cheers and good afternoon! :)
And lovely concluding lines... I always like expressions like 'walking away' :D There's a melancholic but triumphant finality to it, no? :D And the thing about depressed people cannot be sad... all wit, in line with the GB we know! :)
Great series. Very insightful, funny and lot of straight-talk. What could be of additional help is if you point out somethings wannabe writers should do to take the plunge and become published writers - how to get one's writing published.
Just yesterday I was talking with a German friend of mine who was saying that in Germany writing is much more well paid, very specialized and well respected as it is a local job (writing articles in German language is not done by many non Germans!), but it is not so big business and confined to Germany, but here in UK people don't give enough importance to the process of writing and to the writers as well as writing jobs can be outsourced or done by people with different specialization. Therefore we see lots and lots of English resource all over but often we find them repetitive or not very well presented. In India there are so many things to do in the field of writing, we grew up reading Enid Blyton, and today kids read J.K.Rowling, we don't have any Indian children author, well yes regionally some but no one connecting with children of today coming from all over India or who are living outside India. For women we have more or less only Femina magazine which of course does not connect to all layers of educated women in India. So it is very much needed that some publisher should try not to always consider the market and business but have courage to bring out some non conventional stuff, I am sure Indian readers are hungry for those.
And I'm the fellow who told the teachers i don't care, you can'r edit a single word. Think I won't survive here. Unless, of course I start a publishing house...
And writers are narcissistic..never seen any who isn't.
@Karthik- :) Glad to have been of use!
@Ungil- Thank you! I enjoyed writing this series...I've been wanting to put down all these thoughts somewhere and I feel ordered inside my head now.
@Anon- I will. But not immediately...I think I'll give my wise-avatar a break for now!
@Chandrima- There are small, uncoventional publishing houses that are coming up in India. And they are trying to achieve a balance between making money and publishing what they believe in. The thing is, it is not possible to run a business without having a profit motive- without the money to pump back into the system, it will ultimately fail. And they have to worry not just about the audiences (how many Indian parents buy moderately expensive Indian books for their children? They expect Indian children's literature to be inexpensive and the genre they prefer is usually mythology) but also distribution networks and retailers (even places like Landmark don't give proper display space to publishing houses like Tulika...they just dump them in a heap...they don't restock sold-out books often either). So though the idealism should be kept alive, they are also forced to remain practical. It's a tightrope walk.
I was talking more about the writers here than the publishers. Writers need to understand the framework within which publishers operate. If they don't, it might just lead to a lot of frustration.
@Vishesh- Sure, writers are narcissistic. But if you don't allow yourself to be a little practical, you might just meet Narcissus's fate :) Editing should not be seen as an insult. It's part of the process and you have to be open to it. Read any novel that comes with an acknowledgment....you'll find the author thanking the editor there. Editors help you shape your MS, don't disregard them.
I was gone for a month so read up on all the back log in the last two days and wow.. what gems!
The 'On Writing' series needs to be printed and filed :)
I will keep all of it in mind even if I never write for a living!
Have I said this before - I absolutely love reading you! Even though most of the Tamizh is lost on me, but I am in Chennai now so there is hope. For starters I can identify Arya from Suriya and Ajith ;)
Lot of parallels- creativity vs earning your bread exists in engineering, I'm sure it exists elsewhere too. But writers have it easy to practice their art through blogs etc now, QED.
But you will realize these privileges exist, not the least for daily wage earner or someone who is too busy thinking of the next meal/job. We're plain lucky. Just my 2 random paise...
-anonfan
@Vini- Thank you :) And may your Thamizh skills grown enough to recognize that Surya is da bestu :D
@Anonfan- Of course- without money, any art form will eventually die. You can't think of verses when your stomach is growling. Which is why I've mentioned that I had a support system in the form of my family (Writing for Living-2)...one can afford to be depressed and throw artistic temperaments only if one needn't worry about basic needs.
And yes, there are several professionals who want to be writers and who write on the side. That's perfectly fine too. But this series was intended for those who want to write for a living. As for writers having it easy...if you are talking about blogging...why, yes, anyone can blog. But how many will pay to read a blog? Writing and getting a consistent audience is hard enough...getting paid for it is even harder.
Nice series...Good insights..Straight from the horse's mouth. Appreciation is important to keep a writer going. The command you have over the language is amazing. Keep up the good work.
:)
My missus' comment: She sounds like an old person talking to adults.
@vishesh - after reading the entire series you'd still say: And I'm the fellow who told the teachers i don't care, you can'r edit a single word. *sigh*
@Dhivakar- Thanks :)
@Visitor- Always happy to pontificate. I wish they'll call me to address school assemblies when I'm 60. I'll say I'm 60 years young and make young-at-heart speeches. Can't wait :D
After ruminating on your post, some questions popped up regarding editing:
Is the editor the best judge of what is saleable?
How does he/she determine what is to be edited?
Who is a good editor?
How do you as a writer, know which of the editor's rulings are sensible?
In other words, I am asking about traits and the job requirements of an editor.
A post on this as addendum to the series?
Post a Comment